Université Don Bosco de Lubumbashi
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Matthias Klinghardt
|
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (1)
Affiner la recherche Interroger des sources externes

[article]
| Titre : |
The Marcionite Gospel and the Synoptic Problem : A New Suggestion |
| Type de document : |
texte imprimé |
| Auteurs : |
Matthias Klinghardt, Auteur |
| Année de publication : |
2008 |
| Article en page(s) : |
pp. 1-27. |
| Langues : |
Anglais (eng) |
| Mots-clés : |
MARCION MARCIONITE GOSPEL SYNOPTIC PROBLEM |
| Résumé : |
The most recent debate of the Synoptic Problem resulted in a dead-lock: The best-established solutions, the Two-Source-Hypothesis and the Farrer-Goodacre-Theory, are burdened with a number of apparent weaknesses. On the other hand, the arguments raised against these theories are cogent. An alternative possibility, that avoids the problems created by either of them, is the inclusion of the gospel used by Marcion. This gospel is not a redaction of Luke, but rather precedes Matthew and Luke and, therefore, belongs into the maze of the synoptic interrelations. The resulting model avoids the weaknesses of the previous theories and provides compelling and obvious solutions to the notoriously difficult problems. |
in Novum Testamentum > 50/1 (2008) . - pp. 1-27.
[article] The Marcionite Gospel and the Synoptic Problem : A New Suggestion [texte imprimé] / Matthias Klinghardt, Auteur . - 2008 . - pp. 1-27. Langues : Anglais ( eng) in Novum Testamentum > 50/1 (2008) . - pp. 1-27.
| Mots-clés : |
MARCION MARCIONITE GOSPEL SYNOPTIC PROBLEM |
| Résumé : |
The most recent debate of the Synoptic Problem resulted in a dead-lock: The best-established solutions, the Two-Source-Hypothesis and the Farrer-Goodacre-Theory, are burdened with a number of apparent weaknesses. On the other hand, the arguments raised against these theories are cogent. An alternative possibility, that avoids the problems created by either of them, is the inclusion of the gospel used by Marcion. This gospel is not a redaction of Luke, but rather precedes Matthew and Luke and, therefore, belongs into the maze of the synoptic interrelations. The resulting model avoids the weaknesses of the previous theories and provides compelling and obvious solutions to the notoriously difficult problems. |
|  |