[article] 
inEphemerides theologicae lovanienses > vol 100/3-4 (2024) . - pp 665 - 699

Titre :	The Roman Canon An Anaphora for the Future
Type de document :	texte imprimé
Auteurs :	Joris Geldhof, Auteur
Année de publication :	2025
Article en page(s) :	pp 665 - 699
Langues :	Anglais (eng)
Résumé :	Over against many hesitations and even downward rejections of the Roman canon, this article argues that there is a future for this unique anaphora, both in theological thinking and in liturgical practice. However, it is neither easy nor evident to clear the way for such an argumentation, for the Roman canon is loaded with heavy charges. Many scholars throughout the long twentieth century, particularly those belonging to the Liturgical Movement, considered it pastorally ineffective, theologically inappropriate, and even infertile at the spiritual level, all of this in spite of its venerable age and the massive impact it had on the shape and the understanding of the Eucharist in Western Christianity. Attention is paid subsequently to four clusters of interpretation which still determine the reputation of the Roman canon: (i) the composition of the text, which seems to consist of heterogeneous pieces and thus suffer from a lack of logic; (ii) the absence of an epiclesis, which is derived from the not explicit mentioning of the Holy Spirit; (iii) the supposedly disproportionate use of sacrificial language in the text; and (iv), as a consequence of all these evaluations, the question of whether or not to keep the Roman canon in the missal or to replace it. Based on a fine hermeneutics of the text of the anaphora as it is currently in use in Roman Catholicism, it is shown that the Roman canon has interesting things to offer for the future of the Church: due attention to the formation of the Church beyond the limits of the gathered assembly, including the saints, and a model of prayer which does not artificially disregard the notion of (self-)offering.

[article] The Roman Canon An Anaphora for the Future [texte imprimé] / Joris Geldhof, Auteur . - 2025 . - pp 665 - 699.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Ephemerides theologicae lovanienses > vol 100/3-4 (2024) . - pp 665 - 699

Résumé :

Over against many hesitations and even downward rejections of the Roman canon, this article argues that there is a future for this unique anaphora, both in theological thinking and in liturgical practice. However, it is neither easy nor evident to clear the way for such an argumentation, for the Roman canon is loaded with heavy charges. Many scholars throughout the long twentieth century, particularly those belonging to the Liturgical Movement, considered it pastorally ineffective, theologically inappropriate, and even infertile at the spiritual level, all of this in spite of its venerable age and the massive impact it had on the shape and the understanding of the Eucharist in Western Christianity. Attention is paid subsequently to four clusters of interpretation which still determine the reputation of the Roman canon: (i) the composition of the text, which seems to consist of heterogeneous pieces and thus suffer from a lack of logic; (ii) the absence of an epiclesis, which is derived from the not explicit mentioning of the Holy Spirit; (iii) the supposedly disproportionate use of sacrificial language in the text; and (iv), as a consequence of all these evaluations, the question of whether or not to keep the Roman canon in the missal or to replace it. Based on a fine hermeneutics of the text of the anaphora as it is currently in use in Roman Catholicism, it is shown that the Roman canon has interesting things to offer for the future of the Church: due attention to the formation of the Church beyond the limits of the gathered assembly, including the saints, and a model of prayer which does not artificially disregard the notion of (self-)offering.