Université Don Bosco de Lubumbashi
Mention de date : march 2011
Paru le : 30/03/2011
|
Dépouillements
Ajouter le résultat dans votre panier

[article]
| Titre : |
Schweitzer and Paul |
| Type de document : |
texte imprimé |
| Auteurs : |
James Carleton Paget, Auteur |
| Année de publication : |
2011 |
| Article en page(s) : |
pp. 223-256. |
| Langues : |
Anglais (eng) |
| Résumé : |
This article examines the history of Albert Schweitzer’s study of Paul, which culminated in probably his most important New Testament work, The Mysticism of Paul the Apostle . In it an attempt is made to address the question of the origins of Schweitzer’s singular theory about the apostle’s theology and the influences behind it. The claim is made that Schweitzer arrived at his theory relatively early, possibly by 1902. The article also addresses the question as to why Schweitzer decided to pen Mysticism so late, in 1930, when he had ceased to be a New Testament scholar and was engaged with work of a different kind. |
in Journal for the Study of the New Testament > Volume 33/3 (march 2011) . - pp. 223-256.
[article] Schweitzer and Paul [texte imprimé] / James Carleton Paget, Auteur . - 2011 . - pp. 223-256. Langues : Anglais ( eng) in Journal for the Study of the New Testament > Volume 33/3 (march 2011) . - pp. 223-256.
| Résumé : |
This article examines the history of Albert Schweitzer’s study of Paul, which culminated in probably his most important New Testament work, The Mysticism of Paul the Apostle . In it an attempt is made to address the question of the origins of Schweitzer’s singular theory about the apostle’s theology and the influences behind it. The claim is made that Schweitzer arrived at his theory relatively early, possibly by 1902. The article also addresses the question as to why Schweitzer decided to pen Mysticism so late, in 1930, when he had ceased to be a New Testament scholar and was engaged with work of a different kind. |
|  |

[article]
| Titre : |
Historiography of Antisemitism versus Anti-Judaism : A Response to Robert Morgan |
| Type de document : |
texte imprimé |
| Auteurs : |
Susannah Heschel, Auteur |
| Année de publication : |
2011 |
| Article en page(s) : |
pp. 257-279. |
| Langues : |
Anglais (eng) |
| Résumé : |
[x] close
Historiography of Antisemitism versus Anti-Judaism: A Response to Robert Morgan
Abstract
Responding to Robert Morgan’s plaidoyer for Christianity by claiming a distinction between theological anti-Judaism and modern, racial antisemitism, this article demonstrates that the texts of pro-Nazi German Protestant theologians integrate race and religion with a fluidity that obviates a sharp distinction between the two terms. Antisemitic propaganda produced by Christian theologians during World War II leaves the strictly theological realm in its use of Nazi language and concepts, even when framed in a Christian context, and demands a different kind of conceptualization by historians. Why a group of theologians—professors, instructors, students, pastors and bishops—sought the dejudaization of Christianity during the Third Reich requires attentiveness by historians to the affinities these theologians thought they recognized between Christianity and the claims of modern racial theorists. General historians of Nazi social history will benefit from greater awareness of the racialization of significant sectors of the Christian community in Germany, and students of postwar German theology will benefit from considering the legacy of the pre-1945 Nazification of certain university theological faculties as well as Nazi-era racial tendencies in certain strands of theological scholarship. |
in Journal for the Study of the New Testament > Volume 33/3 (march 2011) . - pp. 257-279.
[article] Historiography of Antisemitism versus Anti-Judaism : A Response to Robert Morgan [texte imprimé] / Susannah Heschel, Auteur . - 2011 . - pp. 257-279. Langues : Anglais ( eng) in Journal for the Study of the New Testament > Volume 33/3 (march 2011) . - pp. 257-279.
| Résumé : |
[x] close
Historiography of Antisemitism versus Anti-Judaism: A Response to Robert Morgan
Abstract
Responding to Robert Morgan’s plaidoyer for Christianity by claiming a distinction between theological anti-Judaism and modern, racial antisemitism, this article demonstrates that the texts of pro-Nazi German Protestant theologians integrate race and religion with a fluidity that obviates a sharp distinction between the two terms. Antisemitic propaganda produced by Christian theologians during World War II leaves the strictly theological realm in its use of Nazi language and concepts, even when framed in a Christian context, and demands a different kind of conceptualization by historians. Why a group of theologians—professors, instructors, students, pastors and bishops—sought the dejudaization of Christianity during the Third Reich requires attentiveness by historians to the affinities these theologians thought they recognized between Christianity and the claims of modern racial theorists. General historians of Nazi social history will benefit from greater awareness of the racialization of significant sectors of the Christian community in Germany, and students of postwar German theology will benefit from considering the legacy of the pre-1945 Nazification of certain university theological faculties as well as Nazi-era racial tendencies in certain strands of theological scholarship. |
|  |

[article]
| Titre : |
‘You will desire to see and you will not see [it]’ : Reading Luke 17.22 as Antanaclasis |
| Type de document : |
texte imprimé |
| Auteurs : |
T. J. Lang, Auteur |
| Année de publication : |
2011 |
| Article en page(s) : |
pp. 281-302. |
| Langues : |
Anglais (eng) |
| Résumé : |
This article argues for a reading of Lk. 17.22 as antanaclasis, which is a form of rhetorical wordplay in which the same (or a similar) term is repeated, but in two different senses. According to this reading, Jesus introduces his discourse to the disciples (vv. 22-37) with the prediction that in the coming days they will desire to ‘see’ (as in witness) one of the days of the Son of Man but they will not ‘see’ (as in comprehend) these days when they occur among them so long as they fail to understand that suffering is primary to the Son of Man’s identity. Such a reading coheres with the larger Lukan theme of the blindness of the disciples to the necessity of Jesus’ passion. Such a reading also requires a rethinking of the assumption that the subject of Jesus’ discourse in 17.22-37 is the parousia. |
in Journal for the Study of the New Testament > Volume 33/3 (march 2011) . - pp. 281-302.
[article] ‘You will desire to see and you will not see [it]’ : Reading Luke 17.22 as Antanaclasis [texte imprimé] / T. J. Lang, Auteur . - 2011 . - pp. 281-302. Langues : Anglais ( eng) in Journal for the Study of the New Testament > Volume 33/3 (march 2011) . - pp. 281-302.
| Résumé : |
This article argues for a reading of Lk. 17.22 as antanaclasis, which is a form of rhetorical wordplay in which the same (or a similar) term is repeated, but in two different senses. According to this reading, Jesus introduces his discourse to the disciples (vv. 22-37) with the prediction that in the coming days they will desire to ‘see’ (as in witness) one of the days of the Son of Man but they will not ‘see’ (as in comprehend) these days when they occur among them so long as they fail to understand that suffering is primary to the Son of Man’s identity. Such a reading coheres with the larger Lukan theme of the blindness of the disciples to the necessity of Jesus’ passion. Such a reading also requires a rethinking of the assumption that the subject of Jesus’ discourse in 17.22-37 is the parousia. |
| ![‘You will desire to see and you will not see [it]’ vignette](https://bibliotheque-udbl.org/pmb/opac_css/images/vide.png) |

[article]
| Titre : |
Imitating Paul’s Relationship to the Gospel : 1 Corinthians 8.1-11.1 |
| Type de document : |
texte imprimé |
| Auteurs : |
Dustin W. Ellington, Auteur |
| Année de publication : |
2011 |
| Article en page(s) : |
pp. 303-315. |
| Langues : |
Anglais (eng) |
| Résumé : |
To overcome past shortcomings in the interpretation of Paul’s exhortation ‘Imitate me, as I imitate Christ’ (1 Cor. 11.1), we must study the roles of Paul’s ‘I’ and Christ in the context of 1 Cor. 8.1—11.1. Christ died for the weak (8.11), and Paul’s renunciation of his apostolic rights follows this pattern. Paul’s self-portrayal reaches its climax when he says that he does all things for the sake of the gospel, in order to be συγκòıνωνòςς αυτòυ (9.23). This article proposes that the expression συγκòıνωνòςς αυτòυ contains more shades of meaning than scholars have previously allowed. It summarizes Paul’s aim to be the gospel’s partner in the salvation of others and to participate in the gospel’s pattern and power. Paul’s call to imitation exhorts the Corinthian believers to share in his relationship to the gospel, working with it for the salvation of others and allowing its pattern and power to shape their life together. |
in Journal for the Study of the New Testament > Volume 33/3 (march 2011) . - pp. 303-315.
[article] Imitating Paul’s Relationship to the Gospel : 1 Corinthians 8.1-11.1 [texte imprimé] / Dustin W. Ellington, Auteur . - 2011 . - pp. 303-315. Langues : Anglais ( eng) in Journal for the Study of the New Testament > Volume 33/3 (march 2011) . - pp. 303-315.
| Résumé : |
To overcome past shortcomings in the interpretation of Paul’s exhortation ‘Imitate me, as I imitate Christ’ (1 Cor. 11.1), we must study the roles of Paul’s ‘I’ and Christ in the context of 1 Cor. 8.1—11.1. Christ died for the weak (8.11), and Paul’s renunciation of his apostolic rights follows this pattern. Paul’s self-portrayal reaches its climax when he says that he does all things for the sake of the gospel, in order to be συγκòıνωνòςς αυτòυ (9.23). This article proposes that the expression συγκòıνωνòςς αυτòυ contains more shades of meaning than scholars have previously allowed. It summarizes Paul’s aim to be the gospel’s partner in the salvation of others and to participate in the gospel’s pattern and power. Paul’s call to imitation exhorts the Corinthian believers to share in his relationship to the gospel, working with it for the salvation of others and allowing its pattern and power to shape their life together. |
|  |
