Université Don Bosco de Lubumbashi
Détail de l'auteur
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (1)
Affiner la recherche Interroger des sources externes

[article]
| Titre : |
Sancti Viri, Ut Audio: Theologies, Rhetorics, and Receptions of the Pelagian Controversy Reappraised by Anthony Dupont et al. (review) |
| Type de document : |
texte imprimé |
| Auteurs : |
Thomas P. Scheck, Auteur |
| Année de publication : |
2025 |
| Article en page(s) : |
pp. 473-475 |
| Langues : |
Anglais (eng) |
| Résumé : |
In 1989 Matthijs Lamberigts argued that the Pelagian controversy should not be assessed on the basis of an either-or attitude and that the possible rehabilitation of Pelagius or Julian cannot be linked to a repudiation or rejection of Augustine’s positions. Such an attitude would only result in a mirror image of former approaches to the matter and would not truly advance the scientific research into this dispute.
It appears to me that the contributors to the volume under review have by and large adhered to this plea for balance, moderation, and respect. The title of this book recalls Augustine’s words about Pelagius in De peccatorum meritis et remissione 3.1.1: “a holy man, I hear.” The essays are all in English and reappraise the antique “Pelagian” controversy with its now recognized myriads of theologies, rhetorics, and receptions. |
in Journal of Early Christian Studies > n°3 (2025) . - pp. 473-475
[article] Sancti Viri, Ut Audio: Theologies, Rhetorics, and Receptions of the Pelagian Controversy Reappraised by Anthony Dupont et al. (review) [texte imprimé] / Thomas P. Scheck, Auteur . - 2025 . - pp. 473-475. Langues : Anglais ( eng) in Journal of Early Christian Studies > n°3 (2025) . - pp. 473-475
| Résumé : |
In 1989 Matthijs Lamberigts argued that the Pelagian controversy should not be assessed on the basis of an either-or attitude and that the possible rehabilitation of Pelagius or Julian cannot be linked to a repudiation or rejection of Augustine’s positions. Such an attitude would only result in a mirror image of former approaches to the matter and would not truly advance the scientific research into this dispute.
It appears to me that the contributors to the volume under review have by and large adhered to this plea for balance, moderation, and respect. The title of this book recalls Augustine’s words about Pelagius in De peccatorum meritis et remissione 3.1.1: “a holy man, I hear.” The essays are all in English and reappraise the antique “Pelagian” controversy with its now recognized myriads of theologies, rhetorics, and receptions. |
|  |