Université Don Bosco de Lubumbashi
Détail de l'auteur
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (1)
Affiner la recherche Interroger des sources externes
[article]
| Titre : |
Luke’s Use of Mark as παράφρασις : Luke’s Use of Mark as παράφρασις: Its Effects on Characterization in the ‘Healing of Blind Bartimaeus’ Pericope (Mark 10.46-52/Luke 18.35-43) |
| Type de document : |
texte imprimé |
| Auteurs : |
Timothy Brooking, Auteur |
| Année de publication : |
2011 |
| Article en page(s) : |
pp. 70-89. |
| Langues : |
Anglais (eng) |
| Résumé : |
The Healing of Blind Bartimaeus’, as Mk 10.46-52 is often called, has been taken over and restated with various changes in Lk. 18.35-43. This article views Luke’s modification of the account in terms of πάράφράσις (‘paraphrase’), a progymnasmatic exercise in which the writer changed the form of expression while keeping the thoughts. It is argued that Luke’s πάράφράσις of Mark’s account enhances characterization of three characters— Jesus, the λάός (‘people’) and the ‘blind man’—by creating a favorable portrait of each of them over against some respective inferior counterpart. |
in Journal for the Study of the New Testament > Volume 34/1 (september 2011) . - pp. 70-89.
[article] Luke’s Use of Mark as παράφρασις : Luke’s Use of Mark as παράφρασις: Its Effects on Characterization in the ‘Healing of Blind Bartimaeus’ Pericope (Mark 10.46-52/Luke 18.35-43) [texte imprimé] / Timothy Brooking, Auteur . - 2011 . - pp. 70-89. Langues : Anglais ( eng) in Journal for the Study of the New Testament > Volume 34/1 (september 2011) . - pp. 70-89.
| Résumé : |
The Healing of Blind Bartimaeus’, as Mk 10.46-52 is often called, has been taken over and restated with various changes in Lk. 18.35-43. This article views Luke’s modification of the account in terms of πάράφράσις (‘paraphrase’), a progymnasmatic exercise in which the writer changed the form of expression while keeping the thoughts. It is argued that Luke’s πάράφράσις of Mark’s account enhances characterization of three characters— Jesus, the λάός (‘people’) and the ‘blind man’—by creating a favorable portrait of each of them over against some respective inferior counterpart. |
|  |
