Université Don Bosco de Lubumbashi
Détail de l'auteur
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (1)
Affiner la recherche Interroger des sources externes

[article]
| Titre : |
True and False Prophecy : Jeremiah’s Revision of Deuteronomy |
| Type de document : |
texte imprimé |
| Auteurs : |
HIBBARD J. Todd, Auteur |
| Année de publication : |
2011 |
| Article en page(s) : |
pp. 339-358. |
| Langues : |
Anglais (eng) |
| Résumé : |
Deuteronomy 18.15-22 offers a criterion of predictive accuracy for judging prophets. It is argued here that Jeremiah takes up this criterion and renders it problematic. A critical examination of three passages from Jeremiah reveals the nature of the critique: Jer. 18, 26 and 28. One key aspect of this critique involves Jeremiah’s accent on YHWH potentially changing his mind (םהב). The conclusion is reached that Jeremiah de-emphasizes the role of prophet as prognosticator in favor of the view that a prophet’s role is to spur moral, social, and religious change. As a postscript, a brief examination of Jonah’s understanding of this matter demonstrates that not all prophets were in agreement on the value of Jeremiah’s change. |
in Journal for the Study of the Old Testament > 35/3 (March 2011) . - pp. 339-358.
[article] True and False Prophecy : Jeremiah’s Revision of Deuteronomy [texte imprimé] / HIBBARD J. Todd, Auteur . - 2011 . - pp. 339-358. Langues : Anglais ( eng) in Journal for the Study of the Old Testament > 35/3 (March 2011) . - pp. 339-358.
| Résumé : |
Deuteronomy 18.15-22 offers a criterion of predictive accuracy for judging prophets. It is argued here that Jeremiah takes up this criterion and renders it problematic. A critical examination of three passages from Jeremiah reveals the nature of the critique: Jer. 18, 26 and 28. One key aspect of this critique involves Jeremiah’s accent on YHWH potentially changing his mind (םהב). The conclusion is reached that Jeremiah de-emphasizes the role of prophet as prognosticator in favor of the view that a prophet’s role is to spur moral, social, and religious change. As a postscript, a brief examination of Jonah’s understanding of this matter demonstrates that not all prophets were in agreement on the value of Jeremiah’s change. |
|  |