Université Don Bosco de Lubumbashi
Détail de l'auteur
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (1)
Affiner la recherche Interroger des sources externes

[article]
| Titre : |
Intertextuality, Literary Competence and the Question of Readership : Some Preliminary Observations |
| Type de document : |
texte imprimé |
| Auteurs : |
Cynthia Edenburg, Auteur |
| Année de publication : |
2010 |
| Article en page(s) : |
pp. 131-148. |
| Langues : |
Anglais (eng) |
| Résumé : |
This article reconsiders the extent recitation and memorization played in the process of the literary composition and transmission of biblical texts, and attempts to distinguish between aurally recognizable intertextual echoes, as opposed to literary patterning based upon visual recognition. The findings of recent cognitive studies are applied in evaluating two sets of questions: first, whether different types of biblical intertextuality would have been equally recognizable to both listeners and readers; and second, whether scribes who produced intertextual compositions consulted and referred to written texts, or whether biblical intertextuality stems from the author’s trace memories of texts read or performed. |
in Journal for the Study of the Old Testament > 35/2 (december 2010) . - pp. 131-148.
[article] Intertextuality, Literary Competence and the Question of Readership : Some Preliminary Observations [texte imprimé] / Cynthia Edenburg, Auteur . - 2010 . - pp. 131-148. Langues : Anglais ( eng) in Journal for the Study of the Old Testament > 35/2 (december 2010) . - pp. 131-148.
| Résumé : |
This article reconsiders the extent recitation and memorization played in the process of the literary composition and transmission of biblical texts, and attempts to distinguish between aurally recognizable intertextual echoes, as opposed to literary patterning based upon visual recognition. The findings of recent cognitive studies are applied in evaluating two sets of questions: first, whether different types of biblical intertextuality would have been equally recognizable to both listeners and readers; and second, whether scribes who produced intertextual compositions consulted and referred to written texts, or whether biblical intertextuality stems from the author’s trace memories of texts read or performed. |
|  |