Université Don Bosco de Lubumbashi
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Sylvio Hermann De Franceschi
|
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (18)
Affiner la recherche Interroger des sources externes
[article]
| Titre : |
Les derniers feux de la querelle de la grâce : Le jansénisme français et la question thomiste à la fin du XVIIIe siècle |
| Type de document : |
texte imprimé |
| Auteurs : |
Sylvio Hermann De Franceschi, Auteur |
| Année de publication : |
2010 |
| Article en page(s) : |
pp. 27-81. |
| Langues : |
Français (fre) |
| Résumé : |
On the 21st July 1773, pope Clement XIV orders the suppression of the Society of Jesus. One of the most underestimated consequences of the pontifical decision was, beyond all doubt, a new repartition of the theological factions which were fighting each other in the quarrel over grace, after the disparition of one of the most influent institutional protagonist of this controversy. The present essay aims at analysing how a sort of circular permutation then happened by which Dominicans invaded a polemical space not long ago occupied by Molinists, while Augustinians were playing the part previously allotted to Thomists. Following a philothomist tactic to which they were for ages prone, the Jansenists have not been successful in accommodating themselves to this alteration of the controversial equilibrium. |
in Ephemerides theologicae lovanienses > 86/1 (2010) . - pp. 27-81.
[article] Les derniers feux de la querelle de la grâce : Le jansénisme français et la question thomiste à la fin du XVIIIe siècle [texte imprimé] / Sylvio Hermann De Franceschi, Auteur . - 2010 . - pp. 27-81. Langues : Français ( fre) in Ephemerides theologicae lovanienses > 86/1 (2010) . - pp. 27-81.
| Résumé : |
On the 21st July 1773, pope Clement XIV orders the suppression of the Society of Jesus. One of the most underestimated consequences of the pontifical decision was, beyond all doubt, a new repartition of the theological factions which were fighting each other in the quarrel over grace, after the disparition of one of the most influent institutional protagonist of this controversy. The present essay aims at analysing how a sort of circular permutation then happened by which Dominicans invaded a polemical space not long ago occupied by Molinists, while Augustinians were playing the part previously allotted to Thomists. Following a philothomist tactic to which they were for ages prone, the Jansenists have not been successful in accommodating themselves to this alteration of the controversial equilibrium. |
|  |
Permalink
Permalink
Permalink
Permalink
Permalink
Permalink
Permalink
Permalink
Permalink
Permalink
