Université Don Bosco de Lubumbashi
Détail de l'auteur
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (2)
Affiner la recherche Interroger des sources externes

[article]
| Titre : |
The Phantom Returns : Delbert Burkett's Rehabilitation of Proto-Mark |
| Type de document : |
texte imprimé |
| Auteurs : |
David J. Neville, Auteur |
| Année de publication : |
2008 |
| Article en page(s) : |
pp. 135-173. |
| Langues : |
Anglais (eng) |
| Résumé : |
In 2004 Delbert Burkett published a book entitled Rethinking the Gospel Sources: From Proto-Mark to Mark, the first of a projected three-volume study of the sources of the canonical gospels. In this first volume, Burkett first challenges the widely accepted assumption that the synoptic gospels stand in direct literary relation to each other and subsequently reconstructs various recensions of an original Proto-Mark to explain the similarities and differences in the so-called “Markan tradition”. If Burkett is correct that no two canonical gospels stand in direct literary relation to each other, this has significant implications for their interpretation. Thus this study appraises the cogency of his argument against any direct literary relations between the synoptics.
|
in Ephemerides theologicae lovanienses > 84/1 (2008) . - pp. 135-173.
[article] The Phantom Returns : Delbert Burkett's Rehabilitation of Proto-Mark [texte imprimé] / David J. Neville, Auteur . - 2008 . - pp. 135-173. Langues : Anglais ( eng) in Ephemerides theologicae lovanienses > 84/1 (2008) . - pp. 135-173.
| Résumé : |
In 2004 Delbert Burkett published a book entitled Rethinking the Gospel Sources: From Proto-Mark to Mark, the first of a projected three-volume study of the sources of the canonical gospels. In this first volume, Burkett first challenges the widely accepted assumption that the synoptic gospels stand in direct literary relation to each other and subsequently reconstructs various recensions of an original Proto-Mark to explain the similarities and differences in the so-called “Markan tradition”. If Burkett is correct that no two canonical gospels stand in direct literary relation to each other, this has significant implications for their interpretation. Thus this study appraises the cogency of his argument against any direct literary relations between the synoptics.
|
|  |

[article]
| Titre : |
Toward a Teleology of Peace: Contesting Matthew's Violent Eschatology |
| Type de document : |
texte imprimé |
| Auteurs : |
David J. Neville, Auteur |
| Année de publication : |
2007 |
| Note générale : |
pp. 131-161. |
| Langues : |
Anglais (eng) |
| Résumé : |
The reality of violence and the question of how best to respond to it are crucial dimensions of biblical interpretation. In the Gospel according to Matthew, Jesus teaches nonviolence and conducts his mission nonviolently, yet Matthew envisages that as the returning Son of humanity he will indulge in violent retribution at the parousia. This article probes the discrepancy between Matthew's ethical portrait of Jesus as a teacher of nonretaliation and his (own) violent eschatology. Following a survey of select studies of Matthew's retributive eschatology, the moral problem of eschatological violence is considered. The article concludes with some hermeneutical reflections on potential responses to eschatological vengeance in Matthew. |
in Journal for the Study of the New Testament > Volume 30/2 (december 2007)
[article] Toward a Teleology of Peace: Contesting Matthew's Violent Eschatology [texte imprimé] / David J. Neville, Auteur . - 2007. pp. 131-161. Langues : Anglais ( eng) in Journal for the Study of the New Testament > Volume 30/2 (december 2007)
| Résumé : |
The reality of violence and the question of how best to respond to it are crucial dimensions of biblical interpretation. In the Gospel according to Matthew, Jesus teaches nonviolence and conducts his mission nonviolently, yet Matthew envisages that as the returning Son of humanity he will indulge in violent retribution at the parousia. This article probes the discrepancy between Matthew's ethical portrait of Jesus as a teacher of nonretaliation and his (own) violent eschatology. Following a survey of select studies of Matthew's retributive eschatology, the moral problem of eschatological violence is considered. The article concludes with some hermeneutical reflections on potential responses to eschatological vengeance in Matthew. |
|  |