Université Don Bosco de Lubumbashi
Détail de l'auteur
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (2)
Affiner la recherche Interroger des sources externes
[article]
| Titre : |
Literary Unity and Reception History : Reading Luke—Acts as Luke and Acts |
| Type de document : |
texte imprimé |
| Auteurs : |
C. Kavin Rowe, Auteur |
| Année de publication : |
2007 |
| Article en page(s) : |
pp. 449-457. |
| Langues : |
Anglais (eng) |
| Résumé : |
In the effort both to clarify and advance the present scholarly discussion, this article continues a conversation about (a) the reception history of Luke and Acts and (b) the hermeneutical implications that derive from such history . After a brief recapitulation of the status quaestionis, the article presses for a clear distinction between literary unity and reception history. It then moves to examine the cogency of the suppositions about the history of the Lukan writings prior to their reception in the second century (and beyond) and suggests a scenario that renders intelligible the later developments. Finally, the article concludes with some reflections about the pertinence of reception history to New Testament studies.
Key Words: Reception history • literary unity •
|
in Journal for the Study of the New Testament > Volume 29.4 (june 2007) . - pp. 449-457.
[article] Literary Unity and Reception History : Reading Luke—Acts as Luke and Acts [texte imprimé] / C. Kavin Rowe, Auteur . - 2007 . - pp. 449-457. Langues : Anglais ( eng) in Journal for the Study of the New Testament > Volume 29.4 (june 2007) . - pp. 449-457.
| Résumé : |
In the effort both to clarify and advance the present scholarly discussion, this article continues a conversation about (a) the reception history of Luke and Acts and (b) the hermeneutical implications that derive from such history . After a brief recapitulation of the status quaestionis, the article presses for a clear distinction between literary unity and reception history. It then moves to examine the cogency of the suppositions about the history of the Lukan writings prior to their reception in the second century (and beyond) and suggests a scenario that renders intelligible the later developments. Finally, the article concludes with some reflections about the pertinence of reception history to New Testament studies.
Key Words: Reception history • literary unity •
|
|  |
