Université Don Bosco de Lubumbashi
Détail de l'auteur
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (3)
Affiner la recherche Interroger des sources externes
[article]
| Titre : |
The Roll, the Codex, the Wax Tablet and the Synoptic Problem |
| Type de document : |
texte imprimé |
| Auteurs : |
POIRIER John C., Auteur |
| Année de publication : |
2012 |
| Article en page(s) : |
3-30 |
| Langues : |
Anglais (eng) |
| Résumé : |
The Farrer hypothesis, especially as defended by Michael Goulder, has often been faulted for its supposed reliance on an anachronistic and technically impracticable understanding of Luke’s compositional practices. A closer look at the arguments against Farrer and Goulder, however, reveals a number of problems with this charge, including (but not limited to) its dependence on an inadequate understanding of how works were actually composed in antiquity. Goulder’s suggestion that Luke worked backwards through Matthew, in particular, has received a certain amount of criticism, but that scenario is shown here to be both technically feasible and perfectly in keeping with the way the ancients sometimes worked. Perhaps the greatest problem with the arguments made against the Farrer hypothesis is that they ignore Luke’s likely use of the wax tablet as a compositional aid—a medium that would have allowed Luke to rearrange Matthew’s material as freely as Farrerians suppose. |
in Journal for the Study of the New Testament > volume 35/1 (2012) . - 3-30
[article] The Roll, the Codex, the Wax Tablet and the Synoptic Problem [texte imprimé] / POIRIER John C., Auteur . - 2012 . - 3-30. Langues : Anglais ( eng) in Journal for the Study of the New Testament > volume 35/1 (2012) . - 3-30
| Résumé : |
The Farrer hypothesis, especially as defended by Michael Goulder, has often been faulted for its supposed reliance on an anachronistic and technically impracticable understanding of Luke’s compositional practices. A closer look at the arguments against Farrer and Goulder, however, reveals a number of problems with this charge, including (but not limited to) its dependence on an inadequate understanding of how works were actually composed in antiquity. Goulder’s suggestion that Luke worked backwards through Matthew, in particular, has received a certain amount of criticism, but that scenario is shown here to be both technically feasible and perfectly in keeping with the way the ancients sometimes worked. Perhaps the greatest problem with the arguments made against the Farrer hypothesis is that they ignore Luke’s likely use of the wax tablet as a compositional aid—a medium that would have allowed Luke to rearrange Matthew’s material as freely as Farrerians suppose. |
|  |
[article]
| Titre : |
The Synoptic Problem and the Field of New Testament Introduction |
| Type de document : |
texte imprimé |
| Auteurs : |
POIRIER John C., Auteur |
| Année de publication : |
2010 |
| Article en page(s) : |
pp. 179-190. |
| Langues : |
Anglais (eng) |
| Résumé : |
The synoptic problem is an important and visible subfield within NT studies, yet, for some reason, almost every NT introduction written in the past forty or so years has passed on a defective understanding of that subfield. Two problems in particular plague these NT introductions: (1) their discussions of the synoptic problem tend to rely on a logical argument disproven almost sixty years ago, and (2) they tend to misrepresent the current state of the question by marginalizing the Farrer hypothesis, which today is the Two-Source Theory’s leading competitor. |
in Journal for the Study of the New Testament > Volume 32/2 (2009) . - pp. 179-190.
[article] The Synoptic Problem and the Field of New Testament Introduction [texte imprimé] / POIRIER John C., Auteur . - 2010 . - pp. 179-190. Langues : Anglais ( eng) in Journal for the Study of the New Testament > Volume 32/2 (2009) . - pp. 179-190.
| Résumé : |
The synoptic problem is an important and visible subfield within NT studies, yet, for some reason, almost every NT introduction written in the past forty or so years has passed on a defective understanding of that subfield. Two problems in particular plague these NT introductions: (1) their discussions of the synoptic problem tend to rely on a logical argument disproven almost sixty years ago, and (2) they tend to misrepresent the current state of the question by marginalizing the Farrer hypothesis, which today is the Two-Source Theory’s leading competitor. |
| |
